Jump to content



Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Quantum : (16 December 2014 - 11:02 AM) Can you compare 904hb vs DI 95 vs veylix 988?
@  HossOnMoss : (15 December 2014 - 06:56 PM) Did I forget to tell you about these? http://bombsquadgolf...214/#entry71313
@  ROBOPTI : (15 December 2014 - 09:49 AM) PINK RECOILS ?? .... where ?? ... I love it already
@  TWshoot67 : (14 December 2014 - 03:09 PM) OH those PINK Recoils are calling my name.... :golf: :golf: :yahoo:
@  PLYSGLF : (07 December 2014 - 10:05 AM) SEAvsPHI! either going to be a great game or a CRAP game.
@  ROBOPTI : (03 December 2014 - 03:47 PM) Posted Image
@  TWshoot67 : (27 November 2014 - 01:51 PM) Wishing all my fellow BSG'rs a blessed Thanksgiving Day! And may the Eagles put a hurting on those Cowgirls....
@  SouthShoreRob : (27 November 2014 - 09:01 AM) @ROBOPTI: I've got Modus Tour 120 shafts coming from Hoss. Can't wait to try them out!
@  SouthShoreRob : (27 November 2014 - 08:55 AM) Happy Thanksgiving BSG!! :kev: :chat: :cheers:
@  ROBOPTI : (25 November 2014 - 08:41 AM) Modus is the best steel shaft out there .. PERIOD :thumbsup:
@  biu997 : (24 November 2014 - 10:25 PM) nippon modus
@  HossOnMoss : (24 November 2014 - 01:37 PM) @TWshoot67: Hard to say what the outcome and results will be, but hiring Como is a good move. He is one of these guys that is really on the cutting edge of the science of the golf swing which will blend well with what Tiger was doing under Foley. Como without a doubt though will have to make some changes, but at least it's not a total "start over" process and he knows what he's doing. Looks like Tiger is going to take more control over what he does with his game rather than following a teacher's instruction to the letter.
@  HossOnMoss : (24 November 2014 - 01:35 PM) @BingHogan: That would be a good test. Without a real formal apples to apples test, my impressions are that KBS Tour V actually shares a mix of characteristics from Modus 120 and 130.
@  TWshoot67 : (23 November 2014 - 01:11 PM) So what's everyones take on Tiger's new swing coach, Chris Como. Thoughts?
@  BingHogan : (21 November 2014 - 01:47 PM) Hey Hoss, any thoughts on doing a comparison of the Nippon 120's vs the KBS Tour V Tour?
@  HossOnMoss : (20 November 2014 - 10:48 AM) What do you guys think about Golf Digest's / Dan Jenkins' recent "interview" with Tiger? http://bombsquadgolf...iew-with-tiger/
@  ROBOPTI : (14 November 2014 - 10:14 AM) Bing - Birds of a feather - Those are the same 2 I am beating on lately (BC+ / 30)
@  ROBOPTI : (14 November 2014 - 09:02 AM) Posted Image
@  HossOnMoss : (12 November 2014 - 08:47 PM) Check out these Taylormade tour issue TP wedges and UDI's including the rare 47° PW and 23° #4 UDI. http://bombsquadgolf...-utility-irons/
@  HossOnMoss : (11 November 2014 - 07:43 PM) And by the way guys, the new Big Bertha Alpha 815 and DBD heads exceeded my expectations today in my initial testing. Really good stuff from Rutherford Road in these new heads! :smilie_cally:
@  HossOnMoss : (11 November 2014 - 07:39 PM) @rfdegen: If it makes you feel any better, I don't take it for granted. :D
@  rfdegen : (11 November 2014 - 03:08 PM) While Hoss is checking out the Game Golf and checking in new releases, we're shoveling snow.
@  HossOnMoss : (10 November 2014 - 10:11 PM) The new Big Bertha 815 heads look killer! New Titleist 915 drivers are on the way as well. I foresee a shootout on Trackman in the few days!!!
@  J13 : (10 November 2014 - 06:30 PM) Very Very nice !!!! Heard the DBD is NASTY!
@  HossOnMoss : (10 November 2014 - 05:45 PM) New Big Bertha 815 Alpha and Double Black Diamond driver heads are in and they look AWESOME!!!
@  Sherri : (06 November 2014 - 06:35 PM) New logo now in place. Hard refresh to see it! :) (ctrl + F5)
@  ROBOPTI : (06 November 2014 - 12:24 PM) THANKS GANG gang - And YES Sir Miller was using the XPHLEXXX ;) ... I feel aweful for him. He really wanted it. I am back in town - Got a bunch of pics - I'll be back soon
@  Qwagmire : (05 November 2014 - 10:37 AM) they gave Joe and XPHLEXXX a shout out, great job ROBO. Free Samples? :4:
@  J13 : (05 November 2014 - 06:54 AM) Correct me if i'm wrong but watching tv, Joe Miller was using an XPHLEXXX. Robo great work getting your shaft in the top 8 you have a lot to be proud of brother!!!!
@  slick : (04 November 2014 - 01:56 PM) Red Stripe...Check! Chips & Salsa....Check! Watching the Remax WLDC Tonight...CHECK!
@  Callaway_Anthony : (02 November 2014 - 05:58 PM) Golf Channel 11/4 10pm EST
@  Callaway_Anthony : (02 November 2014 - 05:58 PM) Everyone be sure to watch the longest hitters in the world compete for $250k!
@  J13 : (30 October 2014 - 04:13 PM) Thanks my man can't recommend your builds enough :6:
@  HossOnMoss : (30 October 2014 - 01:05 PM) That's awesome, J!!! I appreciate the kind feedback. Congrats! :thumbsup:
@  J13 : (29 October 2014 - 05:52 PM) Hellooooooo out there. My Hoss built irons recently helped me shoot an all time low of 67 from the tips. Marcus your work is second to none my friend.
@  rfdegen : (27 October 2014 - 12:48 PM) Played my last 18 of the season on Friday. Course closes this weekend, but I'll be in Iowa pheasant hunting.
@  Armyguy13 : (20 October 2014 - 08:14 PM) Voted for Andrew --- he's currently in the lead with 65.5% to 26.5% being the next place vote getter
@  TWshoot67 : (20 October 2014 - 04:54 PM) Andrew great job and I hope you make the Guinness book of world records. You got my vote! shared and tweeted.
@  HossOnMoss : (20 October 2014 - 01:46 PM) @Quantum: Rome 988 is actually a little smoother feeling and higher launch than DI-95 hybrid without feeling "loose" or being spinny. Rome 888 is going to launch lower and spin less than Speeder 757.
@  ROBOPTI : (17 October 2014 - 03:05 PM) BSGers - Fellow member & Cally Kings of Distance member Fraketrain needs our help !!! - For a spot in the Guiness Book of World Records http://www.guinnessw...ote-now!-61189/
@  Quantum : (17 October 2014 - 05:56 AM) Can you compare veylix 988 to GD DI 95 hybrid? Also veylix 888 to Fuji speeder 757?
@  J13 : (15 October 2014 - 06:11 AM) Congrats Robo I have it DVR'ed to watch can't wait. Well DONE !!!!!
@  ROBOPTI : (14 October 2014 - 11:14 AM) 1st episode of the REMAX WLDC is TONIGHT at 9PM CST ... Tune in and look for XPHLEXXX !!! ... Our Team had a GREAT showing !!!!
@  ROBOPTI : (14 October 2014 - 11:13 AM) 2014 REMAX WORLD LONG DRIVER CHAMIONSHIP pics going up longdrive section - and I have a TON !!!!!!!!!!!! more
@  ROBOPTI : (10 October 2014 - 07:45 AM) Posted Image ... WHAT IS UP !!! .. Gang - Been away for a while ... But - I AM BACK !!!! .. And I Have an insane amount of photos & info to share. Here we go !!!
@  BingHogan : (08 October 2014 - 10:29 AM) They still have a few I 20's on the shelf. Just need somethin' until all the new drivers come out next spring.
@  J13 : (07 October 2014 - 07:50 AM) I"m using an I25 now love it but the G30 LST is coming around January
@  BingHogan : (07 October 2014 - 12:08 AM) So, is the Ping I 25 dead!? Loved the I 20 with the K.
@  BingHogan : (05 October 2014 - 09:27 PM) Saw him hit a putter 280! Then saw him play and putted -- 280... :rolleyes:
@  youngwaldo : (05 October 2014 - 11:12 AM) Yes it is, but we can give him a break because its just for show.
@  Shambles : (05 October 2014 - 03:11 AM) Isn't that considered building a stance ?
@  Callaway_Anthony : (03 October 2014 - 12:28 PM) Unreal what Jamie Sadlowski can do to a golf ball... 331yds from his knees..
@  Jack : (03 October 2014 - 11:09 AM) Yo BSG! What's going onnnnn!
@  rfdegen : (30 September 2014 - 09:30 AM) All I saw over and over was Euros firing at flags, USA middle of green or off. Euros draining putts left and right, UWA missing a lot with tentative strokes.
@  BingHogan : (29 September 2014 - 09:40 AM) Just heard on The Golf Channel -- if Phil and a few others are on in 2016 -- a new Red, White and Blue Skirt will designed for the ladies/guys!
@  BingHogan : (29 September 2014 - 09:37 AM) I don't know why but I am just pissed about this! If you are going to have an AMERICAN FLAG as big as a battleship on - you best be bringing' it!
@  Qwagmire : (29 September 2014 - 09:29 AM) Best line I read about the Ryder Cup: Mickelson: What has been in common with all of our Ryder Cup losses recently? Scribe: Mickelson was on the team. Phil broke the code, threw everyone under the bus
@  BingHogan : (29 September 2014 - 09:12 AM) AMEN QUAGS -- and who picked out their "costumes". Maybe the Golf Channel can do a complete makeover... I'm sure that's next.
@  Qwagmire : (28 September 2014 - 11:18 PM) US Squad is too spoiled to do anything but watch their stock portfolios.
@  BingHogan : (28 September 2014 - 02:11 PM) He then said: PGA's new mantra instead of "These guys are Good" should be: "these Guys Really Suck!" Thanks Professor, we all agree!
@  BingHogan : (28 September 2014 - 02:09 PM) Friend called. Retired law professor. Told me never to use the word SUCK as it was adolescent term.
@  J13 : (28 September 2014 - 07:56 AM) Well i'm glad football is on today
@  BingHogan : (27 September 2014 - 08:08 PM) So,,they can't play in a wee bit of Real golf conditions. Gettin' beat by French guy. Time for a putting lesson!
@  tmfreak : (27 September 2014 - 07:42 PM) US always wears the most horrid outfits, Saturday RC '14 was a new level of awful. cant possibly play let alone win looking like fools.
@  TWshoot67 : (27 September 2014 - 06:30 PM) USA has EURO just where they want them.... USA:6, EURO:10. The writers are ready for the big story and the cliche' title for said story!
@  J13 : (27 September 2014 - 02:28 PM) Watching Jim Furyk putt makes me want to do a sailor dive off the roof of my house. HIT THE BALL ALREADY
@  lamont6266 : (24 September 2014 - 09:43 PM) The only place I have seen pix is on the dealer's price list. I will try to find it.
@  youngwaldo : (24 September 2014 - 03:46 PM) Where are the pictures?
@  lamont6266 : (22 September 2014 - 10:54 PM) Downside? The number of sets coming stateside is very low. Dammit!
@  lamont6266 : (22 September 2014 - 10:53 PM) Did you guys get a peek at the Bridgestone MuscleBack Blades for 2015? SAAAAWWWEEEEET!
@  BingHogan : (22 September 2014 - 04:38 PM) A lot of buzz about the Driver...
@  BingHogan : (22 September 2014 - 04:37 PM) Saw the Nike Vapor line of irons up close today. Supposed to be 3 versions. Very Impressive.
@  J13 : (19 September 2014 - 09:28 AM) Robo is ABOUT TIME. YOUR A SLACKER!!!!!! Hugs
@  ROBOPTI : (18 September 2014 - 07:38 PM) SYSTEM ISSUE REGARDING FAILURE TO UPLOAD - FIXED !!!
@  J13 : (16 September 2014 - 06:54 PM) BRING THE HEAT XPHLEXXX !!!!!!! :4: :4: :4: :4: :4: :4:
@  ROBOPTI : (16 September 2014 - 01:18 PM) 4 DAYS TO REMAX !!!!
@  birmingham1965 : (16 September 2014 - 09:16 AM) 430
@  birmingham1965 : (16 September 2014 - 09:16 AM) 430
@  J13 : (15 September 2014 - 05:49 AM) hhahah love it Robo
@  ROBOPTI : (12 September 2014 - 07:06 PM) Posted Image
@  ROBOPTI : (12 September 2014 - 06:06 PM) Posted Image
@  J13 : (12 September 2014 - 05:05 PM) Happy Friday BSG
@  BingHogan : (12 September 2014 - 11:24 AM) Looks GREAT, TOO.
@  BingHogan : (12 September 2014 - 11:22 AM) First ball out of the box-- Back of the net! Second, straight little draw. As Kenny Perry once said: " I Kain't miss it!" Really haven't hit a driver like that in years!
@  J13 : (12 September 2014 - 09:45 AM) Bio Cell is a hidden gem. Heard Cobra is bringing the HEAT next year.
@  ROBOPTI : (12 September 2014 - 09:44 AM) Bing ... Bio Cell + is AWESOME ... LOVE !!!! mine
@  BingHogan : (11 September 2014 - 08:29 PM) Hit a Cobra Bio Cell driver today. Very underrated. On the BUY list next month.
@  690MBCOMMANDO : (11 September 2014 - 04:18 PM) Playing plenty of golf out here in Half Moon Bay
@  ROBOPTI : (10 September 2014 - 12:22 PM) Posted Image
@  BingHogan : (10 September 2014 - 09:24 AM) Send some of that rain down to California! Central Valley will be gone by next summer if it doesn't rain/snow. Towns without water...
@  rfdegen : (10 September 2014 - 07:31 AM) We're still playing golf here - in between thunderstorms. Record rains in WI. Sucks!
@  TJR : (09 September 2014 - 09:30 PM) I need to play. Been going to the range, but my swing sucks right now. Playing crooked stick in 2 weeks if the weather is decent.
@  MN NICE : (09 September 2014 - 07:27 PM) NFL is BACK!
@  BingHogan : (09 September 2014 - 03:29 PM) Anybody still playing golf out there!? Man, it's dead.
@  youngwaldo : (09 September 2014 - 10:52 AM) Got mine yesterday. Going to test them tomorrow.
@  rfdegen : (09 September 2014 - 08:58 AM) Got my sleeve of test balls and will be testing them tonight, if it doesn't rain again! Crap! We're flooding around here these days. Enough already!
@  burniemac : (09 September 2014 - 07:42 AM) Just got a sleeve of the Titleist test balls in the mail yesterday
@  BingHogan : (08 September 2014 - 06:16 PM) Sleeves that have been handed out. Looks like more spin probably due to lower spinning drivers coming out.
@  TWshoot67 : (08 September 2014 - 01:56 PM) Are we talking the New Titleist sleeves that have been sent out?
@  TWshoot67 : (08 September 2014 - 01:55 PM) @BingHogan is this ball from a New Company or just a new Proto for next years possible selections?

Photo

Shaft "Puring" - Is it worth it or is it a gimmick?


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Deemac

 
Deemac

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,023 posts
  • LocationGlasgow - Scotland
  • Handicap:5.5
 

Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:10 PM

C'mon you club builders out there - tell me straight...

Are pured shafts worth the extra money, do they yield better results? Or are they a gimmick?

D.
  • 0
In The Bag
Mizuno MP600 Driver 8.5 deg - Matrix Ozik F7M2 Stiff Shaft
Mizuno F60 13.5 Deg 3-wood Prolaunch Red 65s Shaft
Mizuno 17, 20 & 23 Deg Fli Hi CLK Hybrids
Mizuno MP67 5-PW DG S300 Shafts
Guage Design GAS II Wedges 53 & 58 Deg
Mizuno Bettinardi C-03 Putter

#2 Gary

 
Gary

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 935 posts
  • LocationIsle of Man, UK
  • Handicap:3.5
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 04:06 AM

i've had a few clubs pured and to be honest i didn't see or feel any differences, i think i would rather spend the money else where
  • 0

#3 milehighgolfer

 
milehighgolfer

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 269 posts
  • LocationBeech Mountain
  • Handicap:1
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 08:48 AM

C'mon you club builders out there - tell me straight...

Are pured shafts worth the extra money, do they yield better results? Or are they a gimmick?

D.

For a high handicap player results could be minmal, and maybe not noticeable. Tour players will hit a few more fairways and greens which is a big advantage for them. More importantly it can help the consistency of shaft performance with proper orientation to flex properly. Some research suggests that the flex of the same steel shaft can differ up to 44CPM just by changing the orientation of installation in the head. That would make a huge difference in flex rating and could have your set all over the map. If you can find someone that does custom club work, and offers the service, I would suggest trying clubs that have been pure'd and compare numbers from a launch monitor with what you've been using.
  • 0

#4 biervergnugen

 
biervergnugen

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 432 posts
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 09:08 AM

Since first spine aligning a set of steel shaft irons and personally testing the results, I will not put a steel shaft in a club without spine alignment. I did this test on a regular gamer set of mine a while back, mid season, and without question saw clear improvements in accuracy and consistency in shot shape in almost every iron. The irons showing no improvement just so happened to have the shafts correctly orientated from the factory. From the work I've done since, it seems common to have two or three clubs in alignment from the factory. These are often the clubs that the person playing the set will say they are most confident in hitting.

I've done a few graphite shafts for woods as well and found that spine aligning does not offer as much benefit, for most shafts. I am guessing that the construction process for graphite creates a more consistent wall than the welded spine process in steel. However, a few graphites have greatly benefited from this process, specifically the UST V2 series shafts.

I have never paid for the patented, "Puring" service, but it is likely more accurate than the simple spine alignment process I use in my shop. It is definately not a gimmick, but the commercial process does seem a little pricey to me for the amount of work that goes into it.
  • 0

#5 cameronfan99

 
cameronfan99

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Locationcalgary
  • Handicap:0
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:51 PM

C'mon you club builders out there - tell me straight...

Are pured shafts worth the extra money, do they yield better results? Or are they a gimmick?

D.

ive had it done many times to woods, irons, and wedges. and i never noticed a difference out on the course. as far as a difference on the launch monitor the guys who do my fitting put me on there to compare wit non pured and honestly i thought the difference was negligable with the driver and no difference with the irons. ijust dont think it makes enough of a difference (if at all) to go spending money on.
  • 0
weapons of mass distraction

titleist 909 d3 9.5 with ust proforce v2 x flex
tour edge exotics 15 degree with ust proforce v2 x flex
18 degree adams idea pro with ust proforce v2 x flex
3-p titleist mb with dynamic gold x100's
54.08, 60.04 titleist bob vokey spin milled c-c with dynamic gold x100's
scotty cameron terillium newport with platinum finish
grips lamkin crossline full cord
titleist prov1x
foot joy classics

#6 cameronfan99

 
cameronfan99

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Locationcalgary
  • Handicap:0
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:58 PM

Since first spine aligning a set of steel shaft irons and personally testing the results, I will not put a steel shaft in a club without spine alignment. I did this test on a regular gamer set of mine a while back, mid season, and without question saw clear improvements in accuracy and consistency in shot shape in almost every iron. The irons showing no improvement just so happened to have the shafts correctly orientated from the factory. From the work I've done since, it seems common to have two or three clubs in alignment from the factory. These are often the clubs that the person playing the set will say they are most confident in hitting.

I've done a few graphite shafts for woods as well and found that spine aligning does not offer as much benefit, for most shafts. I am guessing that the construction process for graphite creates a more consistent wall than the welded spine process in steel. However, a few graphites have greatly benefited from this process, specifically the UST V2 series shafts.

I have never paid for the patented, "Puring" service, but it is likely more accurate than the simple spine alignment process I use in my shop. It is definately not a gimmick, but the commercial process does seem a little pricey to me for the amount of work that goes into it.

great post, it just made me realize something i need to clarify about my last post, i always have my clubs spine allaigned, what i meant to say was that there was negligable difference between the COMMERCIAL PURING PROCESS and standard spine allaignment. i do not recommend just tossing shafts in your clubs, you will get better performance out of spine allaigned shafts.
  • 0
weapons of mass distraction

titleist 909 d3 9.5 with ust proforce v2 x flex
tour edge exotics 15 degree with ust proforce v2 x flex
18 degree adams idea pro with ust proforce v2 x flex
3-p titleist mb with dynamic gold x100's
54.08, 60.04 titleist bob vokey spin milled c-c with dynamic gold x100's
scotty cameron terillium newport with platinum finish
grips lamkin crossline full cord
titleist prov1x
foot joy classics

#7 Deemac

 
Deemac

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,023 posts
  • LocationGlasgow - Scotland
  • Handicap:5.5
 

Posted 10 February 2010 - 04:53 PM

Thanks Guys!

Very insightful.
  • 0
In The Bag
Mizuno MP600 Driver 8.5 deg - Matrix Ozik F7M2 Stiff Shaft
Mizuno F60 13.5 Deg 3-wood Prolaunch Red 65s Shaft
Mizuno 17, 20 & 23 Deg Fli Hi CLK Hybrids
Mizuno MP67 5-PW DG S300 Shafts
Guage Design GAS II Wedges 53 & 58 Deg
Mizuno Bettinardi C-03 Putter

#8 used balls

 
used balls

    DEMOLITION DIVISION

  • IED TECH

  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationFlorida
  • Handicap:0
 

Posted 11 February 2010 - 07:51 AM

As a clubmaker having pured many shafts I can tell you it would blow you away to see how inconsistent shafts are in both steel and graphite.. However, my take on it is if you have a set of irons that you've played for a while, and you like the way they feel, and know the type of shots you hit with them, leave them alone and continue enjoying them basically, IF IT AINT BROKE DON'T FIX IT. For guys getting a new set and wanting to know their shafts will perform the way they were designed to having a consistent flex and feel through out, get them done. Also I would recommend it for guys who play firmer shafts, guys who are swinging softer shafts like for instance an (A) flex or a weak ® it really won't benefit. Psychologically for all us golfers it's nice knowing our equipment is dialed in which helps with our confidence on the course and might lead to better swings.
  • 0

#9 petter7

 
petter7

    BSG INSIDER

  • *** BLACK OPS ***

  • PipPipPip
  • 19,560 posts
 

Posted 12 February 2010 - 02:05 PM

As a clubmaker having pured many shafts I can tell you it would blow you away to see how inconsistent shafts are in both steel and graphite.. However, my take on it is if you have a set of irons that you've played for a while, and you like the way they feel, and know the type of shots you hit with them, leave them alone and continue enjoying them basically, IF IT AINT BROKE DON'T FIX IT. For guys getting a new set and wanting to know their shafts will perform the way they were designed to having a consistent flex and feel through out, get them done. Also I would recommend it for guys who play firmer shafts, guys who are swinging softer shafts like for instance an (A) flex or a weak ® it really won't benefit. Psychologically for all us golfers it's nice knowing our equipment is dialed in which helps with our confidence on the course and might lead to better swings.


I believe this statement is very true.

But, from a performance standpoint, I think there are other factors that directly relate to shot shaping ability more than
having iron shafts spine aligned or PUREd. I can take a PUREd club and alter the lie angle and hit it like crap or have the
wrong weight and flex, and spine alignment and PUREing won't matter much.

That said, if I have all other specs spot on, will spine alignment and/or PUREing make a noticeable difference in ball flight?
From my personal experience, no, not that I noticed. If my loft and lies are correct and the shaft weight and stiffness is
right, I will have no problem hitting the shots I want to. I have had a couple sets PUREd and I didn't hit them any better
than sets I've had that were not PUREd. For the reason mentioned by used balls and if having it done will not cause a
problem and cost is not an issue, then why not have it done. They give evidence on paper that there is a benefit, so even
though I don't experience it in the real world, it really can't hurt...just in case. :D

The number one reason my irons may start misbehaving is because the loft/lies get skewed. When they are bent properly
I hit them really well. If I were to give a player advice, I would have them get their irons checked for loft and lie before they
get their shafts PUREd. If after that they need some more piece of mind, go ahead and have it done. ;) JMHO
  • 0

#10 biervergnugen

 
biervergnugen

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 432 posts
 

Posted 12 February 2010 - 03:00 PM

But, from a performance standpoint, I think there are other factors that directly relate to shot shaping ability more than
having iron shafts spine aligned or PUREd. I can take a PUREd club and alter the lie angle and hit it like crap or have the
wrong weight and flex, and spine alignment and PUREing won't matter much.

Absolutely! The importance of correct club fitting trumps any tweaks such as spine aligning. Of course, having a solid, repeatable swing doesn't hurt either.

A bit surprised to hear you say that spine alignment produced no noticeable results for you. I will say that the benefit does seem to be seen more by folks that swing with the most 'vigor', but in my experience, the consistency of results yielded by the process is the most common benefit mentioned by better players. Maybe, you're right, it is just thinking that the results will be more consistent that make it so.
  • 0

#11 cameronfan99

 
cameronfan99

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Locationcalgary
  • Handicap:0
 

Posted 12 February 2010 - 08:50 PM

I believe this statement is very true.

But, from a performance standpoint, I think there are other factors that directly relate to shot shaping ability more than
having iron shafts spine aligned or PUREd. I can take a PUREd club and alter the lie angle and hit it like crap or have the
wrong weight and flex, and spine alignment and PUREing won't matter much.

That said, if I have all other specs spot on, will spine alignment and/or PUREing make a noticeable difference in ball flight?
From my personal experience, no, not that I noticed. If my loft and lies are correct and the shaft weight and stiffness is
right, I will have no problem hitting the shots I want to. I have had a couple sets PUREd and I didn't hit them any better
than sets I've had that were not PUREd. For the reason mentioned by used balls and if having it done will not cause a
problem and cost is not an issue, then why not have it done. They give evidence on paper that there is a benefit, so even
though I don't experience it in the real world, it really can't hurt...just in case. :D

The number one reason my irons may start misbehaving is because the loft/lies get skewed. When they are bent properly
I hit them really well. If I were to give a player advice, I would have them get their irons checked for loft and lie before they
get their shafts PUREd. If after that they need some more piece of mind, go ahead and have it done. ;) JMHO

great post, very true about having clubs that fit correctly. my main reason for believing in spine allaigning comes from an experience i had a few years ago. i pulled a titleist 905s out of a used bin with some red harrison shaft in it. we put it on the frequency and this thing wobbled all over the place, i took it out and the thing felt awful, hit it like crap. that being said maybe the psychological aspect of knowing how that shaft had reacted when we frequencied it made me hit it poorly.
  • 0
weapons of mass distraction

titleist 909 d3 9.5 with ust proforce v2 x flex
tour edge exotics 15 degree with ust proforce v2 x flex
18 degree adams idea pro with ust proforce v2 x flex
3-p titleist mb with dynamic gold x100's
54.08, 60.04 titleist bob vokey spin milled c-c with dynamic gold x100's
scotty cameron terillium newport with platinum finish
grips lamkin crossline full cord
titleist prov1x
foot joy classics

#12 insanity16

 
insanity16

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 158 posts
  • Handicap:Club Pro/Ho
 

Posted 16 February 2010 - 10:06 AM

With your High-end graphite shafts, having them pured or spined doesnt make that much difference because of the high quality material used in the manufacturing process. Where as steel shafts and the construction process it does make a difference, and the harder you swing the bigger the difference gets.

But I will agree, that it also has to do with the mental side and the belief that the shaft is in "correctly". Hit 2 exact same clubs, one been aligned and the other not, but when you do this tell yourself that "Club A" is aligned and "Club B" is not, then see the difference.

I know ALL TMAG STAFF DONT BELEIVE IN THIS PROCESS, because it throws the whole r9 theory out the window...FCT will be a goner!!!
  • 0
Weapons of mass frustration

Callaway RAZR Fit 9.5* with Mitsubishi Kai'li 60X @44.5"
CallawayRAZR Fit 3Wood with Mitsubishi K-Series 70X @43"
Callaway RAZR Forged 4-PW With Project X 6.5
Callaway RAZR X Tour Hybrid 3
Callaway Forged Wedge 52(50) Forged Wedge 56 and Forged Wedge 60 with Dynamic Gold Tour Issue
Odyddey Metal-X #7 Long 47"
Callaway
Hex Black
Golf Pride Multi-compound
Spined with JB spine finder Pro
[post='Twitter']http://twitter.com/ ReeceMayberry[/post]

#13 mgl1872

 
mgl1872

    BIO/CHEM DIVISION

  • IED TECH

  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
 

Posted 16 February 2010 - 10:24 PM

OWNING THE NEW AUTOMATED SST MACHINE IT ALSO MEASURES

TORQUE-IT WILL MEASURE THE ACTUAL TORQUE OF THE SHAFT

SHAFT STRAITNESS- IT TOOK 3 SETS OF DG TOUR ISSUES TO GET ONE SET OF SHAFTS THAT WERE NOT BENT FOR SCOTT McCARRON I WAS IN THE HOTEL ROOM IN ORLANDO WHEN THEY DID THEM SO IMAGINE WHAT YOU GET SENT AND UNLESS YOU HAVE THE MACHINE YOU WOULD NEVER KNOW

THEN SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH IT ROTATES THE SHAFT AND BY A PERCENTAGE HOW MUCH IT STABILIZED THE SHAFT SOME AS LITTLE AS 15% BUT SOME AS MUCH AS 90% JUST DEPENDING ON THE SHAFT

I CAN TELL YOU 97% INCLUDING THE NUMBER #1 PLAYER IN THE WORLD HAS ALL THERE CLUBS PURED SO THERE MUST BE SOMETHING TO IT BECAUSE IN NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM ARE THEY PAID OR HALF TO DO IT.

FROM TESTING SHAFTS SPINED, LASERD FLOED AND PURED I CAN SEE THE DISPERSION IS MINIMIZED AND THE GENERAL HEIGHT OF THE BALL STARTS TO LINE UP ON A DESCENT TO WELL STRUCK GOLF BALLS. YOU DONT GET ONE MAX HEIGHT AT 60 FT AND THE NEXT WELL STRUCK BALL GOES 90FT. IT IS NOT GOING TO MAKE YOU A LOWER HANDICAP BECAUSE THERE IS MORE TO THE GAME THEN JUST HITTING THE BALL BUT I HAVE SEEN A GOLFERS MISSES MINIMIZED. SST PUREING IS DOING A HUGE TEST AS WE SPEAK WITH A NON BIASIS COMPANY TO SHOW ACTUALLY HOW MUCH IT IMPROVES A CLUBS PERFORMANCE.

REMEMBER GOLF SHAFTS ARE NOT PERFECTLY ROUND SO BECAUSE OF THIS THE SHAFT NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED CORRECTLY SO IT CAN FLEX CONSISTANTLY. THE LESS MONEY FOR A SHAFT THE MORE IT IS SANDED TO SHAPE(GRAPHITE) SO IMAGINE HOW MUCH OEM OR CHEAP SHAFTS ARE SANDED ON AND THE FLAT SPOTS YOU WILL HAVE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO PAY GOOD MONEY FOR A FITTING AND GETTING CUSTOM SHAFT AND HAVE THE OPTION WHY NOT SPEND THE EXTRA $160 FOR A SET OF IRONS TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE THE BEST THEY CAN BE?

MANY OEM BRANDS DO NOT PERFORM MUCH BETTER THAN THE OTHER BUT ALOT OF PEOPLE PLAY A BRAND BECAUSE A CERTAIN PRO DOES BUT SST PUREING IS THE MOST WIDELY USED COMPANY ON TOUR FOR EQUIPMENT (97% OF THE TOUR)BUT YET PEOPLE QUICKLY DISMISS IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE TO ME.
  • 0

#14 Gary

 
Gary

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 935 posts
  • LocationIsle of Man, UK
  • Handicap:3.5
 

Posted 16 February 2010 - 11:00 PM

OWNING THE NEW AUTOMATED SST MACHINE IT ALSO MEASURES

TORQUE-IT WILL MEASURE THE ACTUAL TORQUE OF THE SHAFT

SHAFT STRAITNESS- IT TOOK 3 SETS OF DG TOUR ISSUES TO GET ONE SET OF SHAFTS THAT WERE NOT BENT FOR SCOTT McCARRON I WAS IN THE HOTEL ROOM IN ORLANDO WHEN THEY DID THEM SO IMAGINE WHAT YOU GET SENT AND UNLESS YOU HAVE THE MACHINE YOU WOULD NEVER KNOW

THEN SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH IT ROTATES THE SHAFT AND BY A PERCENTAGE HOW MUCH IT STABILIZED THE SHAFT SOME AS LITTLE AS 15% BUT SOME AS MUCH AS 90% JUST DEPENDING ON THE SHAFT

I CAN TELL YOU 97% INCLUDING THE NUMBER #1 PLAYER IN THE WORLD HAS ALL THERE CLUBS PURED SO THERE MUST BE SOMETHING TO IT BECAUSE IN NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM ARE THEY PAID OR HALF TO DO IT.

FROM TESTING SHAFTS SPINED, LASERD FLOED AND PURED I CAN SEE THE DISPERSION IS MINIMIZED AND THE GENERAL HEIGHT OF THE BALL STARTS TO LINE UP ON A DESCENT TO WELL STRUCK GOLF BALLS. YOU DONT GET ONE MAX HEIGHT AT 60 FT AND THE NEXT WELL STRUCK BALL GOES 90FT. IT IS NOT GOING TO MAKE YOU A LOWER HANDICAP BECAUSE THERE IS MORE TO THE GAME THEN JUST HITTING THE BALL BUT I HAVE SEEN A GOLFERS MISSES MINIMIZED. SST PUREING IS DOING A HUGE TEST AS WE SPEAK WITH A NON BIASIS COMPANY TO SHOW ACTUALLY HOW MUCH IT IMPROVES A CLUBS PERFORMANCE.

REMEMBER GOLF SHAFTS ARE NOT PERFECTLY ROUND SO BECAUSE OF THIS THE SHAFT NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED CORRECTLY SO IT CAN FLEX CONSISTANTLY. THE LESS MONEY FOR A SHAFT THE MORE IT IS SANDED TO SHAPE(GRAPHITE) SO IMAGINE HOW MUCH OEM OR CHEAP SHAFTS ARE SANDED ON AND THE FLAT SPOTS YOU WILL HAVE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO PAY GOOD MONEY FOR A FITTING AND GETTING CUSTOM SHAFT AND HAVE THE OPTION WHY NOT SPEND THE EXTRA $160 FOR A SET OF IRONS TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE THE BEST THEY CAN BE?

MANY OEM BRANDS DO NOT PERFORM MUCH BETTER THAN THE OTHER BUT ALOT OF PEOPLE PLAY A BRAND BECAUSE A CERTAIN PRO DOES BUT SST PUREING IS THE MOST WIDELY USED COMPANY ON TOUR FOR EQUIPMENT (97% OF THE TOUR)BUT YET PEOPLE QUICKLY DISMISS IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE TO ME.


i just have to say that i didn't quickly dismiss puring, i was very keen on the idea when it first came out and have had many clubs done, i just didn't see any improvement at all, i stick by with what i said in an earlier post, that i would rather spend my money else where. Petter hit the nail on the head, get your clubs fitted properly and if they still dont't perform, look at getting them pured but i wont be, :banana1:
  • 0

#15 mgl1872

 
mgl1872

    BIO/CHEM DIVISION

  • IED TECH

  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
 

Posted 17 February 2010 - 08:02 PM

i just have to say that i didn't quickly dismiss puring, i was very keen on the idea when it first came out and have had many clubs done, i just didn't see any improvement at all, i stick by with what i said in an earlier post, that i would rather spend my money else where. Petter hit the nail on the head, get your clubs fitted properly and if they still dont't perform, look at getting them pured but i wont be, :banana1:


TAKE A BAG FULL OF DYNAMIC GOLD TOUR ISSUES, KBS, PROJECT X OR WHATEVER YOU WANT AND TEST HOW STRAIT THEY ARE ON A PURE MACHINE AND I BET YOU START USING THE MACHINE I BET YOU DONT GET HALF OF THEM IN STRAIT. SO GO AHEAD AND SPEND MONEY ELSEWHERE BUT HOW DO YOU KNOW IF YOUR SHAFTS ARE STRAIT OR IF THE TORQUE IS WHAT IT SAYS IT IS.

PUREING PROVED IT WORKED WHEN THE #1 PLAYER PUT HIS GAMER SET AND BACK UP SET INTO PLAY 2 YEARS AGO WHEN TESTING 12 SETS THAT HAD NO LABELS.
  • -2

#16 Gary

 
Gary

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 935 posts
  • LocationIsle of Man, UK
  • Handicap:3.5
 

Posted 17 February 2010 - 08:33 PM

i have a very experienced club builder out in singapore who i see every couple of mths and i know if he says my clubs are good, they are good, simple as that and he doesn't pure them. and i also know my clubs very well, none of them misbehave, maybe my guy is just so good.

and lastly can you not use capitals, its annoying everyone, thankyou
  • 0

#17 kevin

 
kevin

    DEMOLITION DIVISION

  • IED TECH

  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationCal
  • Handicap:9.9
 

Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:03 PM

Well yes, 97% of the best players in the world (tour players) have it done for there clubs but they are not paying for it either. They also have repeatable swings which is a big plus, and as long as it won't hurt there game they will try it. I have a set of Miura's built by the golf lab and pured, also a set of Epons that aren't pured from Japan, I hit them both the same.......I can't tell any difference from the pured set to the other. I don't have a repeatable swing, but play to a 9, just not good enough to tell the difference.
  • 0

#18 dpark

 
dpark

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 794 posts
 

Posted 21 February 2010 - 11:25 PM

Has anyone ever done a double-blind test comparing sets that were pured and those that were not? I am by no means an expert in puring, but unlike properly setting up loft/length/lie/swingweight for your clubs, I have yet to see definitive, measurable data that shows how pured club improves consistency or the quality of golf shots over a club that was professionally blueprinted, but NOT pured.
  • 0
Ping Rapture 10.5* with Project X 5.5
Adams 5050 16* with Code-8 S-flex
Adams A2P 20* with Fujikura Rombax 8D07HB S-flex
Titleist 681 4-PW with DG-S300
Scratch 8260 52*/56*/60* with DG-S300
Scotty Cameron Napa

#19 Shambles

 
Shambles

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 460 posts
 

Posted 22 February 2010 - 02:23 AM

Has anyone ever done a double-blind test comparing sets that were pured and those that were not? I am by no means an expert in puring, but unlike properly setting up loft/length/lie/swingweight for your clubs, I have yet to see definitive, measurable data that shows how pured club improves consistency or the quality of golf shots over a club that was professionally blueprinted, but NOT pured.


I doubt such data will be made available or even made to exist.

There was a time wherein testing and selecting components, i.e., making a matching set, made sense but that was long ago when manufacturing of Golf clubs was far less precise or standardized than today's product. Back then it was fairly common to have a club or two in the set that just didn't work properly for you. Golfers back then primarily relied upon feel, ( what they felt was right ), to decide upon keeping or tossing a club. We still do things like that today but mostly with Drivers and Putters.

These days we are fairly safe taking a set of well reputed irons and woods off the rack and playing them. Fitting and puring continue to have a place though not nearly as urgent as some might want to believe. You really need to be that much better as a Golfer to be able to appreciate the difference and even if it is very affordable these days, most of us are unlikely to be able to benefit from the improvement except by imagination or sheer faith. I am not excluding the rudimentary fittings that are commonly given by so many shops. That can be very important as a truly badly fit set can make Golf even more difficult. I speak only of that refined fitting and puring that involves much knowledge and skill on the part of the fitter, which can cost a bit but not much relative to the normal cost of clubs, greenfees and caddies plus the attendant celebrations and/or recourses to the practice range.


Shambles
  • 0

#20 petter7

 
petter7

    BSG INSIDER

  • *** BLACK OPS ***

  • PipPipPip
  • 19,560 posts
 

Posted 22 February 2010 - 02:49 AM

Has anyone ever done a double-blind test comparing sets that were pured and those that were not? I am by no means an expert in puring, but unlike properly setting up loft/length/lie/swingweight for your clubs, I have yet to see definitive, measurable data that shows how pured club improves consistency or the quality of golf shots over a club that was professionally blueprinted, but NOT pured.


I've hit a set of irons that were PURED that were built to my specs exactly and I hit them just fine. I also have a set in my bag
right now that were also built to my specs and not PURED and I hit them really well. As I mentioned before, if I have the right
flex, weight, length, loft and lies, I'll hit the set well. Even with +5 type professional players, shaping different type shots is not
an exact science. Swings vary from one to the other, so getting the shafts to flex exactly the same each time is not going to be
possible. Always a bit of imbalance and disparity. From the performance I'm getting with my current irons, I don't feel the need
to get them PURED.
  • 0

#21 biervergnugen

 
biervergnugen

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 432 posts
 

Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:19 AM

Regarding the patented "PURING" process versus spine alignment; I have pulled many factory "PURED" steel shafts as identified by their label and logo attached to the shaft. As a matter of 'pure' curiosity, each time I've removed one, I set it on my spining tool. Guess what, each time, the simple ball-bearing based tool I use in my shop yielded the EXACT same orientation identified by the "PURING" process.

I will not dispute that the there may be something more to the process when working with graphite shafts (especially those from older manufacturing processes) as I have seen graphite shafts with multiple spines where my simple process becomes quite difficult on its own. However, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the added processes, and expense of the patented "PURING" process in question has not one iota of benefit over basic spine alignment when it comes to steel.

Edited by biervergnugen, 22 February 2010 - 09:27 AM.

  • -1

#22 hitsalittle

 
hitsalittle

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 214 posts
 

Posted 22 February 2010 - 12:47 PM

Indirectly was saying it that Im not intelligent because of my grammer. Since you had your stuff built by Golf Lab in California the owner and I played golf in Orlando about a month ago you can ask him if he knows Brandon and tell him I said hello. He has been in the industry for a long time and is a nice guy. As far as the PURE thing whether or not someone can tell, it is making sure the club is installed the best way it can be and that is what I do flex, swingweight, shaft straitness, length, weight etc. I make sure everything is as good as it can be for the customer and I am a dealer for EPON and most of my clients figure at the money EPON cost why not? Atleast if anything I can find out that a shaft might not be strait and they know there shafts were installed the best way they could.

As far as the tour everybody buys Taylormade and Callaway because tour players play them which they are PAID for but PURE is a choice they make and get nothing for it and for almost the entire tour to do it with out getting paid just speakes volume for it, there will be a test released shortly to prove how much you gain out of a club being pured and not they are spending a bunch of money with a non biasis testing company. Everybody has there own opinion but working with shafts everyday I know this machine alone found 7 shafts last week that were not strait and the torques were way off from what I needed besides just Pureing shafts it also does other things that matter in the build as well.


Life is funny - Brandon, I dind't know that was you. I guess I'm the guy that's wrong, since I WOULD let you touch my sticks. for the record, I never said you were an idiot - and I didn't mean to imply it, either. Just that I wouldn't find out one way or the other due to the aforementioned issues in the post.

Anyway, I say get the PURE if you're buying an expensive shaft. No reason not the spend the extra couple bucks on that kind of item. Who cares if it works or not - it probably only matters that you think it might...
  • 0

#23 dpark

 
dpark

    NUCLEAR ORDNANCE TECH

  • IED TECH

  • PipPipPip
  • 794 posts
 

Posted 23 February 2010 - 11:40 AM

I doubt such data will be made available or even made to exist.

These days we are fairly safe taking a set of well reputed irons and woods off the rack and playing them. Fitting and puring continue to have a place though not nearly as urgent as some might want to believe. You really need to be that much better as a Golfer to be able to appreciate the difference and even if it is very affordable these days, most of us are unlikely to be able to benefit from the improvement except by imagination or sheer faith.

Shambles


I've hit a set of irons that were PURED that were built to my specs exactly and I hit them just fine. I also have a set in my bag
right now that were also built to my specs and not PURED and I hit them really well. As I mentioned before, if I have the right
flex, weight, length, loft and lies, I'll hit the set well. Even with +5 type professional players, shaping different type shots is not
an exact science. Swings vary from one to the other, so getting the shafts to flex exactly the same each time is not going to be
possible. Always a bit of imbalance and disparity. From the performance I'm getting with my current irons, I don't feel the need
to get them PURED.


Thanks for both of your replies. I am a pretty "numbers" driven guy and don't believe in doing something if it doesn't translate into something both measureable AND meaningful. That is why I believe that puring will remain a "snake oil" product to the golfing mainstream. They have all these oscillation diagrams that show how a poorly installed shaft compares to a pured one, but nothing that demonstrates that puring translates into improved golfing results i.e. lower scores, improved GIRs etc.

I would love to see a top golfer be given 10 sets of irons that have been blueprinted and only one of those 10 sets has been pured and try to have that pro pick out the pured set from the other 9. If the pure guys are so sure that it makes that much of a difference, it should be easy for any touring pro to pick out that set. If you had a set of clubs that was 4 swingweights higher or even 1/2" longer, I guarantee the pro would figure out that set in a heartbeat. Now if the difference was only 1 swingpoint or 1/8" then it would be much harder, but then again, 1 swingpoint and 1/8" wouldn't make much difference in their results either. I think pureing falls into the same category. There is probably some MEASUREABLE difference in a pured club but I doubt it translates into something MEANINGFUL on the golf course, especially when compared to a well-built and properly fitted set of irons.
  • 0
Ping Rapture 10.5* with Project X 5.5
Adams 5050 16* with Code-8 S-flex
Adams A2P 20* with Fujikura Rombax 8D07HB S-flex
Titleist 681 4-PW with DG-S300
Scratch 8260 52*/56*/60* with DG-S300
Scotty Cameron Napa

#24 petter7

 
petter7

    BSG INSIDER

  • *** BLACK OPS ***

  • PipPipPip
  • 19,560 posts
 

Posted 23 February 2010 - 02:19 PM

I would love to see a top golfer be given 10 sets of irons that have been blueprinted and only one of those 10 sets has been pured and try to have that pro pick out the pured set from the other 9. If the pure guys are so sure that it makes that much of a difference, it should be easy for any touring pro to pick out that set.


That sure would be an interesting examination dpark!! I know I can tell when my loft and lies are not right. One point in swingweight
is another matter. It's hard for me to tell the difference between D0 and D1. I've played with that and wasn't very good telling one from
the other. With overall weight (static) I'm much better at differentiating between light and heavy. I'm not doubting PURED clubs can be
measured to bend in a certain manner more consistently, but, will I be able to hit tighter fades or draws with them?? So far I haven't
noticed that with the PURED clubs I have hit. For me, the clubhead lie angle is what really affects ball flight control with irons more
than anything else once the other specs are in order. I will be most likely building a new set of irons this summer and maybe I'll get
them PURED and do some further testing to see any real advantage. If I can find one, I'll sure use it. ;)
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users